Monday, 30 May 2011

Behind the music: Will record labels and streaming services ever agree?

Former BPI chariman Tony Wadsworth discusses the difficulties involved in securing streaming rights from major labels

In a recent report for Music Tank, Tony Wadsworth challenged the myth that record labels are dinosaurs. At the Great Escape conference in Brighton, the BPI chairman and former CEO of EMI made the case for labels, pointing out that they are now leaner, more diversified and still, by far, the biggest investors in new music.

"They haven't been displaced by other entrants," he says. "Many have tried and many have failed. Investing in artists is empty unless it comes bundled with skills. Live Nation, for example, [struck a $150m deal with Jay-Z] ? yet they didn't manage to establish a new business model." The managers Wadsworth spoke to said they appreciate the work a record-company team does, and that it gives them much more momentum and increases the likelihood of success.

Even Radiohead licensed their In Rainbows album, noted for its pay-what-you-like release, to a number of record labels around the world. Maybe this explains why, in a recent survey by ReverbNation, over 75% of independent artists (including 81% of hip-hop artists and 63% of alternative artists) still aspire to get signed to a record label. The survey also showed that major labels made up the top 10 on the wish lists for artists in every music category.

But how do record labels fare when it comes to licensing new music services? UK labels fare better than labels anywhere else in the world, as they've so far licensed 72 digital music services, according to the BPI. Yet a source involved in many digital music licensing negotiations complained of labels raising their rates in recent negotiations. He also asked what new music services have been launched in the UK in the past two years, apart from mflow. I put the question to Wadsworth. "You've put me on the spot there," he replied. "I'm sure there must have been [some]." He adds that his perception is that rates have actually declined. "I don't want to call [the source] a liar ? maybe it was just the deals he was involved in. There was a time when labels wanted equity in almost every service they licensed. That, I'm assured, has moved on and is less the case now. The labels know that it's in their interest to enable new services, and they do ? but without putting everything on the table and saying 'take what you want'."

A publisher recently told me they had a deal in place with Google's cloud service, which subsequently launched without licenses in place, but suggested that record labels posed a problem. "So what Google are saying is that everybody was fine apart from the people who own the recordings ? that they were being really awkward?" Wadsworth retorts. "What's the alternative [to putting up a fight]? Do you just say: 'Whatever you want to do is great, because you do no evil, we believe.' Nobody's telling me that Google can't afford to pay for music at the right rate, and I don't believe that the record labels are asking for an unreasonable rate from Google. What we can tell by the way it's often articulated by Google, and the way it's sometimes articulated by people in government who are close to Google, is that Google see licensing of creative content ? and I include books in that ? as being an inconvenience. So of course Google thinks the labels are being difficult. You can actually say the same, winding the clock back, about Napster ? they just didn't want to pay."

Wadsworth believes the reason negotiations for Virgin Media's proposed music service have stalled is not due to the amount of money the record labels asked for, but the anti-piracy measures the labels wanted the ISP to implement. This brings us to the Digital Economy Act (DEA). "A lot of people in our industry have been saying that the DEA is a lame duck, and I wish they wouldn't. That's one of the reasons I did this report, because a lot of people are talking our industry down."

Among the people "talking the music industry down" and criticising the DEA are Featured Artist Coalition members Billy Bragg and Radiohead's Ed O'Brien (though, after a meeting at Air studios in 2009, the coalition voted to support what was then the Digital Economy Bill, with the added provision that consumers who were proven to repeatedly download illegally would have their internet connection temporarily throttled instead of temporarily suspended). Wadsworth calls them selfish. "These are people who are right in the glory days of their careers, where they have all the cream. They obviously seem unwilling to share it with anybody. It's wrong. They should be thinking about younger artists and writers. Where do writers stand in all this? They aren't selling T-shirts, are they? These people need to grow up a little bit, because it's not standing up and showing leadership ? it's playing to the gallery, still. If you call an organisation a coalition, you can be strong enough to not have to play to the gallery."


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2011 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/musicblog/2011/may/27/record-labels-streaming-services-google

David Beckham David Guetta 50 Cent Salma Hayek

A love letter to Lindsay Lohan ? and the moving image

Richard Phillips's intimate filmed portrait of Lindsay Lohan shows how the medium is artistically superior to the photograph

The moving image is much more artistically interesting than the still photograph, to me anyway. The photographic image is not as rich as a painting or a drawing ? until it starts to move. The films of Alfred Hitchcock and Luchino Visconti offer poetic images that go far beyond photographs.

But another example of the way moving images are more complex than still photographs is the genre of the filmed portrait. Richard Phillips's 98-second film Lindsay Lohan, which is about to be shown at the Venice Biennale, is an interesting example of this modern kind of portrait.

In the 60s, Andy Warhol filmed the poet John Giorno asleep, and asked visitors to his studio to sit for screen tests, in which they looked directly at a camera. Warhol's filmed portraits have a lyrical, unblinking emotional power. As people struggle to face the cold gaze of his camera, they seem to truly reveal themselves, in moments of disconcerting intimacy.

Douglas Gordon and Philippe Parreno take this idea of the revealing regard of the camera, blandly yet absolutely recording someone's features, mannerisms, and way of relating to the world around them, in their film Zidane: A Twenty-First Century Portrait. A single photograph of Zidane might be striking or charismatic, but can it really show him in full, as a person? By watching one player over the course of a football match from a series of cameras, Zidane seems to capture more than a public persona, more than a famous face, and gets closer to the grain of reality.

Phillips's portrait of Lohan is more openly emotional than these films, for while they stress an even, unemphatic regard ? Warhol's unmoving camera, the series of cameras set up for the Zidane film ? Phillips makes a completely different choice and films Lohan in several dramatic images, edited together in an exhilarating way. The result is a romantic and indeed erotic view of an actor recently in the headlines for violating her probation on a 2007 drink-driving offence.

Lohan is seen as an almost mythical beauty, a pop goddess framed against the sparkling sea, contemplating her own outsized image. The image is bigger than she is: the real Lindsay Lohan is dwarfed by the colossus of her fame ? but this art film is not rejecting the myths of celebrity, it is fascinated and enraptured by those myths. Phillips gleefully lingers in the same amoral realm as his often provocative paintings.

His camera worships Lohan. She becomes a modern Venus by the sea, and her appearances in court and the media seem irrelevant beside the persona he portrays. It is a love letter.

Lohan will not be in Venice for the premiere, as she is currently under house arrest. But this filmed portrait does a good job in her defence. It is a passionate hymn to someone the artist sees as a true star.


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2011 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/artanddesign/jonathanjonesblog/2011/may/30/richard-phillips-lindsay-lohan

Celebrity Gossip Pop Music Movie News Lil Wayne

Anna Karenina ? review

Dundee Rep

When Anna Karenina takes up with her lover Vronsky, someone says she has "gained a shadow". She is not the only one. The characters in Jemima Levick's production are forever being cast as towering silhouettes on the flat wall of Alex Lowde's set. That's when there's no smoky video footage of billowing clouds wafting over it. With the dry ice that accompanies the fateful steam engines that top and tail the show, the mood is as much Brief Encounter as Tolstoy.

Jo Clifford's adaptation strips the novel down to its two tales of social defiance. There is Anna, rejecting her husband's respectability in favour of a lusty young army officer who complains that "no one listens to their heart". And there is Levin, turning against urban materialism in favour of the ethics of the countryside.

It is classily done in a fluid and spacious staging. Kevin Lennon makes a loveable Levin, his arms flailing like a man possessed of a singular idea, and John Buick grows ever more austere ? and frightening ? as Anna's cuckolded husband. But where Emily Winter made a credible Nora in A Doll's House last year, she fails to find the gravitas to make the full journey as Anna. As the put-upon wife, she seems mildly peeved; as the run-away adulterer she is moderately passionate ? much like Tony McGeever's crop-headed Vronsky. With so weak an erotic charge between them, there is too little at stake for us to care about the consequences of their actions, leaving an emotional deficit at the heart of a polished production.

Rating: 3/5


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2011 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/stage/2011/may/29/anna-karenina-review

Salma Hayek Justin Bieber Rap Music Celebrity Gossip

Watch Kristen Stewart & Taylor Lautner?s Promo Videos for 2011 MTV Movie Awards!

So we guess this means they’re officially attending the 2011 MTV Movie Awards! Kristen Stewart and Taylor Lautner shot promos for the show with host Jason Sudeikis. OK! VIDEO: TAYLOR LAUTNER SAYS KRISTEN STEWART WAS “MOST UPSET” ABOUT BREAKING DAWN ENDING Before Jason takes the stage and hosts the 2011 MTV Movie Awards show, he’s [...]

Source: http://www.okmagazine.com/2011/05/watch-kristen-stewart-taylor-lautners-promo-videos-for-2011-mtv-movie-awards/

Shia LeBouef Bruno Mars Thierry Henry Cheryl Cole

Behind the music: Will record labels and streaming services ever agree?

Former BPI chariman Tony Wadsworth discusses the difficulties involved in securing streaming rights from major labels

In a recent report for Music Tank, Tony Wadsworth challenged the myth that record labels are dinosaurs. At the Great Escape conference in Brighton, the BPI chairman and former CEO of EMI made the case for labels, pointing out that they are now leaner, more diversified and still, by far, the biggest investors in new music.

"They haven't been displaced by other entrants," he says. "Many have tried and many have failed. Investing in artists is empty unless it comes bundled with skills. Live Nation, for example, [struck a $150m deal with Jay-Z] ? yet they didn't manage to establish a new business model." The managers Wadsworth spoke to said they appreciate the work a record-company team does, and that it gives them much more momentum and increases the likelihood of success.

Even Radiohead licensed their In Rainbows album, noted for its pay-what-you-like release, to a number of record labels around the world. Maybe this explains why, in a recent survey by ReverbNation, over 75% of independent artists (including 81% of hip-hop artists and 63% of alternative artists) still aspire to get signed to a record label. The survey also showed that major labels made up the top 10 on the wish lists for artists in every music category.

But how do record labels fare when it comes to licensing new music services? UK labels fare better than labels anywhere else in the world, as they've so far licensed 72 digital music services, according to the BPI. Yet a source involved in many digital music licensing negotiations complained of labels raising their rates in recent negotiations. He also asked what new music services have been launched in the UK in the past two years, apart from mflow. I put the question to Wadsworth. "You've put me on the spot there," he replied. "I'm sure there must have been [some]." He adds that his perception is that rates have actually declined. "I don't want to call [the source] a liar ? maybe it was just the deals he was involved in. There was a time when labels wanted equity in almost every service they licensed. That, I'm assured, has moved on and is less the case now. The labels know that it's in their interest to enable new services, and they do ? but without putting everything on the table and saying 'take what you want'."

A publisher recently told me they had a deal in place with Google's cloud service, which subsequently launched without licenses in place, but suggested that record labels posed a problem. "So what Google are saying is that everybody was fine apart from the people who own the recordings ? that they were being really awkward?" Wadsworth retorts. "What's the alternative [to putting up a fight]? Do you just say: 'Whatever you want to do is great, because you do no evil, we believe.' Nobody's telling me that Google can't afford to pay for music at the right rate, and I don't believe that the record labels are asking for an unreasonable rate from Google. What we can tell by the way it's often articulated by Google, and the way it's sometimes articulated by people in government who are close to Google, is that Google see licensing of creative content ? and I include books in that ? as being an inconvenience. So of course Google thinks the labels are being difficult. You can actually say the same, winding the clock back, about Napster ? they just didn't want to pay."

Wadsworth believes the reason negotiations for Virgin Media's proposed music service have stalled is not due to the amount of money the record labels asked for, but the anti-piracy measures the labels wanted the ISP to implement. This brings us to the Digital Economy Act (DEA). "A lot of people in our industry have been saying that the DEA is a lame duck, and I wish they wouldn't. That's one of the reasons I did this report, because a lot of people are talking our industry down."

Among the people "talking the music industry down" and criticising the DEA are Featured Artist Coalition members Billy Bragg and Radiohead's Ed O'Brien (though, after a meeting at Air studios in 2009, the coalition voted to support what was then the Digital Economy Bill, with the added provision that consumers who were proven to repeatedly download illegally would have their internet connection temporarily throttled instead of temporarily suspended). Wadsworth calls them selfish. "These are people who are right in the glory days of their careers, where they have all the cream. They obviously seem unwilling to share it with anybody. It's wrong. They should be thinking about younger artists and writers. Where do writers stand in all this? They aren't selling T-shirts, are they? These people need to grow up a little bit, because it's not standing up and showing leadership ? it's playing to the gallery, still. If you call an organisation a coalition, you can be strong enough to not have to play to the gallery."


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2011 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/musicblog/2011/may/27/record-labels-streaming-services-google

Dennis Quaid Shia LeBouef Bruno Mars Thierry Henry

Sunday, 29 May 2011

Give MPs a night in with Trollope | Mark Lawson

Our political leaders used to love reading and going to the theatre. Now they fear being seen as elitist

Reviewers of the recently published prime ministerial diaries of Harold Macmillan have commented on the remarkable number of novels the politician manages to consume even while running the country: entries regularly confirm the truth of Mac's celebrated claim that he liked nothing better than going to bed early with a Trollope.

This portrait of the reader-leader led the Sunday Times critic to observe that this bookwormery was symptomatic of the dilettante and complacent nature of politics of the period. However, the novelist Stephen Vizinczey riposted in the correspondence columns that Macmillan's "reading helped him to understand far more how life works than position papers".

This disagreement resurrects the recurrent question of whether politicians can spend too much time on politics. Certainly, journals of the past often give the impression that it was once common for Britain to be governed by culture vultures who dabbled in legislation. The index of the second volume of Richard Crossman's diaries, for example ? covering a period when he was a cabinet minister ? is studded with entries such as "attends Much Ado About Nothing", "goes to Das Rheingold", and "sees Space Odyssey 2001". And Sir Peter Hall, in his Diaries, records the then chancellor Denis Healey attending a four-hour performance of Hamlet during a financial crisis.

Such sightings are very rare today. In the present generation of politicians, even culture secretaries speak of hoping eventually to catch the hit movies when they're released on DVD.

The main problem is that modern leadership is frequently a 24-hour business, with a grudging four or five hours conceded for sleep. But the excuse of busyness is complicated. In fact, the firm diagnosis of contemporary spin doctors is that voters don't want their leaders to be working all the time. When the Sun newspaper recently published what American journalism splendidly calls a "tick-tock" of a typical day for the prime minister ("9am: Cobra meeting, 10am: preparation for PMQs", and so on), it was clear that there would be little time for reading or theatre outings, but mainly because of the periods dedicated to joining the children for tea or bathing and bedtime routines.

Apart from encouraging us to fantasise about a Macmillan tick-tock ("9am-11am: grouse-shooting, 2pm-4pm: post-luncheon re-reading Barchester Towers"), the breakdown of a Cameron day is revealing of a shift in attitudes. Spending quality time with the kids has replaced cultural consumption as evidence of a proper work-life balance in a politician. These days, image-conscious leaders will gain far more credit from revealing that they have taken time to read a book to their children, which advertises that they share the values of normality, than of having settled down with some fiction themselves, which would be widely viewed as indicating laziness or complacency.

In widely malevolent times, security is another issue: getting a prime minister safely to the theatre would cost the taxpayer. And the speed of voter reaction through social media complicates the question of repertoire. London Road, the National's brilliant drama with music about the Suffolk prostitute killings, is one of the hot tickets that Cameron, Clegg and Miliband should see ? but objectors would soon be "slamming" them in the tabloids if they did.

But the biggest change since Macmillan's day is the perception that consuming high culture is self-indulgent, suggesting too much time or money, or elitist. Going to the opera as often as Richard Crossman did would be considered by a No 10 chief of staff today as being as image-damaging as a crack-cocaine habit. Better, it's perceived, to pretend to the electorate that you're just like them by knowing what's going on in The X Factor or Britain's Got Talent (Gordon Brown once boasted of having phoned Simon Cowell), or sport.

So, with the Camerons away in Ibiza, Nick Clegg got a seat in the royal box on Saturday to watch Manchester United losing the Champions League final to Barcelona, although it's not clear how the Liberal Democrat leader's present image problems will be helped by being seen watching a once proud and confident outfit reduced to humiliating second strings by an arrogantly superior force. Perhaps an early night with The Barchester Chronicles would have done him more good.


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2011 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/may/29/mps-night-in-trollope

Beyonce Winona Ryder Keanu Reeves Brad Pitt

Mariska Hargitay Comments On Chris Meloni's SVU Exit

Making the sudden and surprising announcement that his longtime "Law & Order: SVU" tenure is coming to an end, Christopher Meloni will certainly be missed by his co-star partner Mariska Hargitay.

The Detective Olivia Benson actress spoke about her beloved castmate's departure for the first time, releasing a statement reading: "For the past 12 years Chris Meloni has been my partner and friend, both on screen and off. He inspired me every day with his integrity, his extraordinary talent and his commitment to the truth."

Expressing her sorrow over the news, Miss Hargitay added, "I love him deeply and will miss him terribly ? I'm so excited to see what he'll do next."

The report of Meloni's SVU exit was made earlier in the week - with NBC confirming the news that Detective Stabler will not be back for what would have been his 13th season this fall.

According to insiders, Christopher is leaving the long-running program after his contract negotiations with the network couldn't come to agreeable terms.

Source: http://celebrity-gossip.net/law-order-svu/mariska-hargitay-comments-chris-melonis-svu-exit-509747

50 Cent Salma Hayek Justin Bieber Rap Music